Consulting

We advise before the architect is hired.

Not on design. On what the project has to achieve, and what the published evidence says will achieve it.

People working at a table by tall windows, drawn as a dot screen

Influence over cost and performance is highest before an architect is hired.

Every project has a short stretch in which a decision still changes the outcome and costs almost nothing to make. It ends when the design work starts, because from then on a change means redrawing, re-coordinating and waiting, and the outcome moves less. The shaded field on the left of the curves below is that stretch.

The ability to impact cost and functional capabilities falls while the cost of changes rises. The two lines cross before an architect is hired. Each stage below links to its row in the table of stages. 01 Project start 02 Project requirements 03 Location and property 04 Design team 05 Design and engineering 06 Construction 07 Occupation 08 Operation We work here neuecon expertise is based on scientific evidence → View all project phases → Costs and risks Ability to impact cost and functional capabilities Cost of changes
Patrick MacLeamy, 2004, published by the Construction Users Roundtable and used in the American Institute of Architects’ Integrated Project Delivery guide. Stage numbers are the same eight stages as in the table below.

A building project has several advisors, and each answers a different question.

We answer two of them. Both decide what the building does to the people inside it, and both have to be answered while the geometry is still open.

Everyone else works from the document those two answers produce: the search criteria, the brief the architect is chosen on, the rules a design is tested against and what gets measured after people move in.

  • How will people perform here?

    How people perceive, think and behave in spaces: what makes them productive, what makes them ill, what makes them stay. We answer it before the design starts, and the answer sets the floor plate.

  • What does the building do to my organisation?

    How should the building show where the organisation is today and where it is heading? Whether it needs a new face, and which habits and which parts of the culture it must not fix in place. What a building states about an organisation has to stay true to staff and to outsiders for as long as it stands.

The other questions, and who answers them

  • Strategy consultants

    What should the organisation do?

  • Master planners

    What can be built on the site?

  • Workplace consultants

    How should the space be laid out? Usually once the building is already fixed.

  • Corporate real estate teams

    What does it cost, and how is it procured?

A building project runs through eight stages, and we work in seven of them.

From the moment something forces the question to the day people move in, a building project runs for years and passes through dozens of hands. The eight stages below name each one, who else works in it and what we do there.

01

Project start

We run it

What the project has to achieve for your organisation. Workshops with your leadership and the people who will use the building. The output is a shared baseline before capital is committed.

Produces: The Strategic Project Blueprint

neuecon Your leadership and boardCorporate real estateYour financial advisors
More details

How long it takes

Six to eight weeks

The Strategic Project Blueprint Governs stages 02 to 08

  • Project Intelligence Who the organisation is, how it actually works today, and what the building has to do for it.
  • Scientific Foundation The scientific topics your project has to get right, named and put in order.

What follows, and who owns it

Everything else in this stage is the organisation’s own to answer, from whether it owns, leases or builds to who decides and what risk it accepts. Our documents take those answers as given.

Project Intelligence: DNA Nature of the organisation and core values. neuecon
Long term vision and strategy
Strategic opportunities the project brings
Project Intelligence: Status quo The trigger: what actually set this in motion neuecon
Organisational status and structural nature
Culture and habits
Project Intelligence: Demand and requirements User ecosystem neuecon
Programme and functional logic
Behaviour patterns the project has to support
Scientific Foundation: The shortlist Naming the research areas that matter for your project neuecon
Identifying the ones that do not
Saying what each one is meant to improve
Scientific Foundation: The order Ranking and prioritising scientific strategies neuecon
Marking where the evidence is already strong, thin, or disputed
Identifying if a certification matters for your project
Governance and readiness Change readiness Your leadership and board
Strategic risk and opportunity picture
Sustainability and reporting objectives
Stakeholder map and communication frame
Governance, decision bodies, mandate
Property strategy Portfolio and real estate strategy Corporate real estate
Own, lease or build
Location strategy at macro level
Financing Financing structure and funding logic Your financial advisors

02

Project requirements

We run it

This is where most of our work happens. We research the scientific areas that matter for your project, search the databases and grade every finding for the quality of the study behind it. What comes out are concrete guidelines for later design choices, each one traceable to a named study. The architect and other advisors work from there.

Produces: The Decision Rulebook · The Evidence Design Brief

neuecon Workplace and requirement consultantsSurvey and occupancy specialistsYour own organisation
More details

How long it takes

Eight to ten weeks

The Decision Rulebook Governs stages 04 and 05

Rules for design choices, each traceable to a named study. The competition brief in stage 04 is written from it and the design reviews in stage 05 are tested against it.

  • Decision principles What the building is for, what wins when two good things compete, and who decides.
  • Evidence-based rules A rule set for each of the eight topics, carrying the study behind it.
  • Evaluation criteria What the building has to change in people, how that gets measured, and what it is worth.
  • Trade-off and dispute logic Two kinds of conflict: priorities that compete, and studies that disagree.

The Evidence Design Brief Governs stage 03 onward

The studies behind every rule, graded, with the search and the reasoning shown. What a property search, a due diligence and a certification are tested against.

What follows, and who owns it

The user surveys, occupancy studies and test fits run alongside our search, and the people who do them do only that. We work from their results and do not repeat them.

Decision principles Strategic intent: what the building is for, carried forward from the blueprint neuecon
Priority hierarchy: what wins when two good things compete
Decision governance: who decides what, and at which level
Evidence-based rules Research translation: every finding turned into a rule a designer can act on neuecon
Environmental rules: light, air, acoustics, temperature
Spatial rules: layout, adjacency, and who needs to be near whom
Nature rules: outlook and planting, and where each earns its place
Material rules: surfaces, colour and furniture
Evaluation criteria Outcomes: what the building has to change in the people who use it neuecon
Performance indicators: what the building has to achieve, with the source for each
Assessment methods: how each one is measured once they are in
Value: a money figure only where the research supports one
Trade-off and dispute logic Competing priorities: two agreed goods pulling against each other neuecon
Contested evidence: where the studies themselves disagree
Resolution: who settles it, on what basis, and at which level
Application framework Phase application: which rule applies at which stage neuecon
Stakeholder roles: who each rule is addressed to
Binding strength: solid binds, moderate is a default, thin is a watch item
The Evidence Design Brief Publishing the search itself: which databases, which terms, which inclusion criteria neuecon
Grading each finding for the quality of the study behind it
Publishing the findings that were excluded, and the reason each was set aside
The workplace programme Requirements and needs analysis Workplace and requirement consultants
Workplace concept
Area programme and space budget
Functional programme and adjacency diagram
Occupancy model and sharing ratio
Operating concept
Surveys and trials User surveys, observation and occupancy studies Survey and occupancy specialists
Capacity checks and use simulations
Test fits
Pilot and sample floors
Internal requirements Technical requirements: IT, security, building controls Your own organisation
Employee representation and workplace regulations
Stakeholder alignment before a trade-off is closed

03

Location and property

We advise

We wrote the criteria a building has to satisfy. We stay to say whether the options actually on the table meet them, and to run the evidence against each one.

neuecon Agents and transaction advisorsDue diligence teamsLawyers and tax advisorsCost and finance advisorsProject managers
More details

What we do here

The criteria are set with the decision rulebook. The buildings must now be tested against them. We take the options as the agents hand it over and test each candidate against what the evidence says the building has to do: which criteria a floor plate can carry, which it cannot, and what a compromise here would cost you later. We do not value the property and we do not build the business case.

What follows, and who owns it

Everything else here is a property process, with its own liabilities and its own regulators, and it stays with the agents, the due diligence teams and the lawyers.

Testing it against the rules Analysing each candidate building against the rules set in stage 02 neuecon
Comparing the shortlist side by side, on the criteria that actually decide the brief neuecon
Running the evidence against the options actually on the table neuecon
Naming what a compromise on any one of them would cost you later neuecon
Finding it Market screening and site search Agents and transaction advisors
Longlist, shortlist, site comparison
Feasibility studies
Potential analyses
Testing it Building analysis Due diligence teams
Area analysis and efficiency ratios
Technical due diligence
Sustainability due diligence
Contaminants and existing-fabric survey
Access, transport and infrastructure
Signing it Legal and tax due diligence Lawyers and tax advisors
Planning law, building code, heritage
Lease or purchase agreement
Public funding and subsidies
Pricing it Business case on a discounted cash flow basis Cost and finance advisors
Outline cost estimate
Fitting it out Functional and technical negotiation support Project managers
Tenant fit-out planning and technical contract annexes

04

Design team

We advise

We wrote the brief and what the jury judges against. We help you pick the right team, not by running new research, but by knowing what the brief was for.

neuecon Competition and procurement advisorsProject managers
More details

What we do here

The blueprint and the rulebook are not a brief. They are what a brief gets written from. Turning them into one is separate work, and it belongs in this stage: every competition and every tender wants a different document, so provide the format the procedure demands, on request. The criteria the jury scores against are aligned with the rules already published, so the assessment is held to the same evidence the rest of the project is. When the proposals come back we identify which team has understood it. We do not run the procedure, and we do not sit on the jury unless you ask us to.

What follows, and who owns it

The procedure itself is sometimes a regulated process, tightly so in the public sector. We have no standing in it.

The brief and the judging Translating the blueprint and the rulebook into the form a competition or a tender needs neuecon
Aligning the jury’s criteria with the rules already published neuecon
Assessing the proposals against those rules, and naming where each one departs from them neuecon
Advising on which team is the right one for this brief neuecon
Running the procedure Competition procedure and jury Competition and procurement advisors
Public procurement procedure
Designer selection and fee negotiation
Contracting strategy Contracting strategy: single trades, general contractor, design-build Project managers

05

Design and engineering

On request

We assess design proposals against the rules, and supply the data and the evidence behind them, including whatever a certification asks for. We do not plan and we do not manage the process.

neuecon The architectEngineersSpecialist designersCertifiers and cost consultants
More details

What we do here

This is the architect's stage. The rulebook is already in the architect's hands, and every design review is held against it. Where you want a certification, we supply the evidence and the project-specific data it asks for, and say what the certificate is actually worth on this project.

What follows, and who owns it

Everything after the brief is design and engineering. The rules we set together early in the process are in their hands.

Holding the design to the rules Assisting the design team in meeting the rules set neuecon
Running assessments on design proposals neuecon
Supplying the evidence and project-specific data for certification neuecon
The design Concept and preliminary design The architect
Detailed design
Approval planning and building application
Construction documentation
Engineering Structural engineering Engineers
Building services: heating, ventilation, cooling, electrical, controls
Building physics, acoustics and daylight
Fire safety
Specialist design Landscape and outdoor space Specialist designers
Interior design, furniture and equipment
Wayfinding and signage
Specialist planning: kitchens, laboratories, medical technology
Certification and tender Certification Certifiers and cost consultants
Tendering and award

06

Construction

Not us

Cost, schedule, quality, interfaces, site. Project managers own every part of it, and there is nothing here we would add.

Project managersSite supervision
More details

What follows, and who owns it

Delivery runs from the first award to the day the keys change hands, and it is a management discipline throughout. This is the one stage where we add nothing at all.

Managing the build Project management Project managers
Project organisation and coordination
Schedule management
Cost management
Quality management
Interface management
Opportunity and risk management
Contract and variation management
On site Site supervision Site supervision
Health and safety coordination
Client and user representation on site
Mock-ups and material sampling

07

Occupation

On request

We make sure you act on what you decided at the beginning, at exactly the point in a project where it is easiest to quietly forget to follow through.

neuecon Commissioning engineersMove and change managers
More details

What we do here

A building is handed over in the weeks when everyone is tired and the decisions taken earlier are easiest to quietly oversee. We come back and check: are the rules of use the organisation agreed to actually in place, and is the building being occupied the way the brief said it would be. What has drifted gets named while it can still be fixed.

What follows, and who owns it

The handover itself is technical and logistical work. It belongs to the people who commission systems and move organisations, and they are better at it than we would be.

Checking the intent survived Comparing the rules of use now in place against what was agreed at the start neuecon
Naming what has to be true on day one for the intent to survive neuecon
Checking, at move-in, that the original decisions are being acted on neuecon
Commissioning Commissioning management Commissioning engineers
Systems balancing and handover
Acceptance, defects and warranty
The move Move and migration management Move and change managers
Change management and communication
Training and onboarding to the new environment

08

Operation

On request

We measure whether the intent held, and document what worked, so you have something to tell your own people, from evidence rather than assertion.

neuecon Facility managementYour workplace team
More details

What gets measured

  • People How people work, concentrate, recover and behave in the building, against the outcomes the project was meant to move.
  • The rules Each rule from the rulebook, held against what the building actually delivers a year in.
  • Use The paths people take, the rooms that get used and the ones that do not, read against what the brief assumed.

The measurements go back into the blueprint and the rulebook, so a second project starts from the first one’s results. A technology partner builds the measuring software.

What we do here

A year in, we measure the building against the decision rules it was governed by: use, conditions and running cost. Satisfaction measurement stays with your workplace team. We document what worked, so you can tell your own people what the building did and show the figures behind it.

What follows, and who owns it

Running the building is its own operation on its own cycle, and it belongs to the teams who are there every day.

Measuring whether it held Running the post-occupancy evaluation against the original decision rules neuecon
Documenting what worked, as the basis for your own internal communication neuecon
Running the building Facility management: technical, infrastructural, commercial Facility management
Space management
Operating cost optimisation
Regulatory and sustainability reporting
Watching it Occupant satisfaction measurement Your workplace team
Continuous adjustment

What we produce

Stage 01

Project start

Project Intelligence
DNA Status quo Demand and requirements
Scientific Foundation
Project-specific research data Identifying the relevant ones Setting the project's success criteria from the research
Report The Strategic Project Blueprint
Project IntelligenceScientific Foundation
Stage 02

Project requirements

Report The Decision Rulebook
Decision principles
  • Strategic intent
  • Priority hierarchy
  • Decision governance
Evidence-based rules
  • Research translation
  • Environmental rules
  • Spatial rules
  • Nature rules
  • Material rules
Evaluation criteria
  • Outcomes
  • Performance indicators
  • Assessment methods
  • Value
Trade-off and dispute logic
  • Competing priorities
  • Contested evidence
  • Resolution
Application framework
  • Phase application
  • Stakeholder roles
  • Binding strength
Report The Evidence Design Brief
The search itself: databases, terms, inclusion criteriaEach finding graded for the quality of its studyThe findings that were excluded, and the reason each was set aside

Stages 01 and 02 of the table above: the three sessions with your people, the eight research areas and the three reports.

Our fee is fixed before an architect is hired.

Our fee covers stages 01 and 02, and it is the same whatever is decided in stages 03 to 08. We do not design, deliver or certify, and we take no share of anything that gets built. The decision rules are written before the money is committed.

The rulebook applies to the whole building, because the research that describes how a person concentrates also describes how a person decides. It covers the shop floor, the floor where the staff sit, the meeting room where a client says yes, the ward where a patient recovers and the lobby a visitor sees first.

We do not ask people what they want.

Preference surveys

We gather what we need from your organisation: how it works, what it is for, where it is going. We do not put a thirty-year decision to a preference survey. What people say they want and what measurably helps them perform are different questions, and the rulebook is built on the second.

Statutory consultation

Where the law requires consultation, through a works council or public-sector staff representation, we write what it has to be based on. We do not run it.

Internal communication

Communicating the change to your people is leadership’s work. We give you the evidence and the reasoning to do it with. We do not stand in front of your staff on your behalf.

We start with a Decision Brief.

We take three weeks and charge a fixed fee. The report is yours even if we stop there.

What that involves →